Washington

Kelp Region

Washington

Washington has a coordinated kelp recovery effort. A state law directs agencies to conserve or recover more than 4,000 hectares of kelp by 2040, alongside protection zones and updated guidance. Monitoring blends underwater surveys, aerial mapping, Tribal knowledge and volunteer programs to track canopy trends. Restoration capacity is growing through bull kelp outplant trials, a nursery and a germplasm bank. Next is to target sites where restoration will persist and speed permitting for community-supported projects.

Pledges Status

  • Committed To The Kelp Forest Challenge:

    Yes
  • Total Pledges:

  • Area Pledged:

    Ha for restoration
  • Money Pledged:

    Million USD for conservation
  • Time Pledged:

    Hours of work
  • Audience Reached:

Area Restored Or Protected

  • Top 4 Area Restored By Species

    ha restored
    Multiple
    Nereocystis luetkeana
  • Total Area Protected

    ha protected

Community Statistics

  • Size of the Community

  • Size of the Community

  • Number of Restoration Projects

    How many projects have started or completed restoration efforts within this Region.
  • Related Papers

    We need knowledge to inform our decisions, see all the research papers published to help manage kelp forests within the Region.

Ecosystem Services

  • Top 4 Genus Restored (Ha):

    genera
    projects
    Nereocystis

View Metrics

People living within 50km of kelp forests:

5,770,628

GDP(B) within 50KM of Kelp:

$434.11 billion

Ocean Warming Rate by 2100 (°C):

2.47 °C

KM2 of Kelp:

9,212

Key Species:

Nereocystis luetkeana

Macrocystis pyrifera

Co-creation of knowledge and thoughtful co-management distinguish Washington State’s approach and are foundational to kelp protection, conservation, and restoration. Safeguarding kelp forests—living infrastructure for marine life—is essential to the health of Washington’s coasts and communities.

Washington State has taken significant steps to coordinate and implement marine vegetation strategies that protect and restore kelp forests, including the Puget Sound Kelp Conservation and Recovery Plan and the Washington State Kelp Forest and Eelgrass Meadow Health and Conservation Plan. One of the most visible milestones was the 2025 designation of bull kelp (Nereocystis luetkeana) as the official state marine forest. Co-presented by Tribal and non-Tribal representatives, this designation reflects growing recognition of kelp’s ecological, cultural, and economic importance, made possible by advances in research, policy, restoration, and public engagement across the state. Washington is shifting from reactive management toward proactive planning. In 2022, the state legislature passed a law—now being implemented—directing the Washington Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to conserve or recover more than 4,000 hectares of kelp forests by 2040. In partnership with Tribal co-stewards, DNR has also established kelp protection zones in select areas. In parallel, the Washington Kelp Policy Advisory Group has convened experts from multiple agencies and sectors to outline strategic priorities and recommendations to strengthen kelp governance. These recommendations (nwstraits.org) include developing guidance and best practices, expanding mapping and priority setting, and maintaining a long-term advisory group. Kelp partners are also working with agencies to explicitly recognize kelp and strengthen protections within state and local plans, codes, and policies. Washington has invested several million dollars in kelp research and recovery through Tribes, state agencies, non-profits, community groups, and local governments. For example, the Puget Sound Habitat Strategic Initiative, in collaboration with federal partners, has invested approximately USD 3 million over the past three years to address key gaps in kelp research, monitoring, and restoration. Kelp is now mapped and monitored using diverse approaches, ranging from in-water surveys to aerial methods, integrating scientific monitoring, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and coordinated volunteer efforts. These programmes directly inform management through tools such as the Floating Kelp Indicator, which compiles data from multiple organizations to assess and track statewide trends. Recent research has advanced understanding of kelp population drivers and stressors (Fales et al. 2023; Weigel et al. 2023), genomics (Gierke et al. 2023; Bemmels et al. 2025), microbiomes (Hochroth and Pfister 2024), and the ecological and social benefits of kelp forests (Shaffer et al. 2023; Weiss et al. 2025). Together, this work improves tracking of kelp health, clarifies causal mechanisms, and highlights the value of kelp ecosystems. While no large-scale kelp restoration or mitigation projects have yet been implemented, restoration techniques continue to advance. Bull kelp restoration trials have shown consistent success in growth and reproduction. Outplants on longlines at discrete sites have grown in each of six consecutive years, in some cases producing limited numbers of wild, next-generation kelps. Practitioners are collaborating internationally to develop scalable cultivation and seeding methods aimed at establishing self-sustaining populations. The Kenneth K. Chew Center for Shellfish Research and Restoration has expanded to include Washington’s first kelp nursery for restoration, along with a germplasm bank housing specimens from more than two dozen sites.

Washington now has strong institutional foundations to expand kelp conservation and management. Genome sequencing data can inform climate-resilient planning by identifying source populations for restoration. Co-developed research and monitoring have revealed local and regional canopy trends, while historical analyses are beginning to identify areas of loss and restoration opportunity. At the same time, the regulatory environment is evolving, with growing interest in streamlining permitting for kelp cultivation and restoration, particularly when projects align with community and conservation goals. Bull kelp’s elevated cultural profile also offers a powerful communication opportunity, positioning it as a flagship species that links marine protection to local identity and pride. Strengthening relationships with coastal communities and Tribal Nations will be essential to ensure efforts remain equitable, grounded, and durable.
Progress in Washington has been driven by deliberate collaboration across policy, science, and public engagement, alongside strategic investments to address critical information gaps. Tribes have played a formative role in initiating, leading, and sustaining kelp conservation and restoration, establishing strong co-stewardship models. One example is the formal partnership between Washington State and the Squaxin Island Tribe to conserve and recover the Squaxin Island kelp bed. State-level recognition of kelp as a conservation priority has helped secure political support and inter-agency alignment. Working groups have bridged research and regulatory needs, while cross-sector engagement has broadened expertise and perspectives. Together, these efforts have created a governance environment increasingly prepared to support kelp conservation at meaningful scales.
Pacific Shellfish Institute