Russia, White Sea

Kelp Region

Russia, White Sea

In the White Sea, kelp has a long history of mapping and harvest, but modern, coordinated monitoring is limited, making recent trends hard to confirm. Processing continues, and quotas can be high on paper even when actual harvest is lower. Large-scale farming is constrained by seasonal ice and cost. A conservation improvement was banning mechanical dredging in favor of manual harvest, reducing seabed damage. Opportunity is to update maps, study climate impacts, and adopt ecosystem-based management that treats kelp as habitat.

Pledges Status

Committed To The Kelp Forest Challenge:

No
We accept pledges to protect or restore kelp forests, increase awareness, assist conservation projects, or inspire the world. If you think you can help the kelp, let us know.

Area Restored Or Protected

  • Top 4 Area Restored By Species

    ha restored
  • Total Area Protected

    ha protected

Community Statistics

  • Number of Restoration Projects

    How many projects have started or completed restoration efforts within this Region.
  • Related Papers

    We need knowledge to inform our decisions, see all the research papers published to help manage kelp forests within the Region.

Ecosystem Services

  • Top 4 Genus Restored (Ha):

    genera
    projects

View Metrics

People living within 50km of kelp forests:

506,321

GDP(B) within 50KM of Kelp:

$5.36 billion

Ocean Warming Rate by 2100 (°C):

3.15 °C

KM2 of Kelp:

7,527

Key Species:

Laminaria digitata

Saccharina latissima

White Sea kelp forests require renewed investigation—modern mapping, climate-impact research, and ecosystem-based conservation planning—to ensure these resources are managed sustainably for future generations.

There are currently no formal monitoring or development programmes for kelp forests in the White Sea, making recent trends difficult to assess. Current understanding relies largely on individual researchers and small research groups. Historically, the White Sea has been the best-studied Arctic basin for kelp in Russia, with extensive 20th-century expeditions and additional work by Mikhaylova and colleagues in the early 21st century. During the Soviet era, kelp (particularly Laminariales and Fucales) was treated as a high-value resource, prompting standing-stock assessments and the development of harvest strategies (Gemp 1962). The most comprehensive distribution map still derives from surveys conducted between 1965–1984 (Vozhinskaya 1986), with subsequent mapping efforts limited to local areas.

In the White Sea—and Russia more broadly—kelp continues to be perceived primarily as an extractive resource for food, feed, and industrial compounds (Vozhinskaya 1986), rather than as an ecosystem of ecological significance. The Arkhangelsk Algae Plant, founded in 1918 and relaunched in 1948, remains a distinctive facility producing sodium alginate, technical mannitol, and agar. Since the late 1980s, production waste from mannitol extraction has been repurposed across industries, and since 2010 the plant has expanded into eco-products, including natural medicines and food additives (snowsea.ru/o-nas/history/). This trajectory demonstrates potential for broader kelp applications across sectors. Permitted harvest quota for the White Sea was 49,597 tonnes in 2022, yet actual harvest was only ~913 tonnes (Northwest Territorial Administration of Rosrybolovstvo 2022). Despite multiple harvesting companies operating in Pomorye and Karelia, the large gap between allowable and realised harvest suggests both ecological and economic constraints. Although cultivation techniques were developed during the late Soviet period, large-scale kelp mariculture remains infeasible due to seasonal ice cover and high operational costs (Tsetlin et al. 2010).

Conservation gains in the White Sea have been tied to shifts in harvesting practice. A major change occurred in the 1990s, when mechanical dredging was banned in favour of manual harvesting, reducing seabed disturbance and helping maintain kelp stocks (Blinova 2007; Tsetlin et al. 2010). Earlier attempts to restore kelp through the addition of hard substrate (e.g., boulders and even tires) were also trialled (Blinova 2007). Today, however, there are no dedicated programmes recognising kelp forests as biodiversity-supporting ecosystems. Some limited protection exists within the Kandalaksha Nature Reserve, though its mandate primarily focuses on fauna rather than kelp conservation (kandalaksha-reserve.ru/inform).