Keifuku Consultant - Wakasa Bay

Restoration Project

Keifuku Consultant - Wakasa Bay

Restoration Objective:

The objective of this study is to monitor and compare the brown seaweed, especially the Sargassum species distribution and coverage multi-temporally at three points, as well as to investigate their succession over the observation times (years 1 and 3) on the artificial reef constructed in Wakasa Bay, Japan, and to compare them to the natural reef.

Site Selection Criteria:

The artificial reefs were constructed in Wakasa Bay (Fig. 1). This bay is located in the Japan Sea at Honshu Island between the Cape Echizen at the east and the Cape Kyoga at the west. The artificial reef was installed to west of the fishing port in the southern part of the bay near the natural reef. Table 1 provides the coordinates (latitude/longitude) at each survey site. The distance between the artificial and natural reefs is ~ 10 m. The water depth of the artificial reef is ~ 3–7 m, and the bottom sediment is sand. The water depth of the natural reef is ~ 2–6 m, and the bottom sediment is pelitic mixed-rock gravel (Nakae et al. 2002).

Cause Of Decline:

Unfortunately, 6,400 ha of seagrass and seaweed beds have been lost along Japan's coast, of which Sargassum beds accounted for 22% from 1978 to 1991 due to the increase in coastal land ll sites at ports (Terawaki et al. 2003).

Key Reasons For Decline:

Water Pollution

Scientific Paper

Comparison of Sargassum community succession between artificial and natural reefs in Wakasa Bay, Japan

Matsui, A., Kawamura, M., Nozawa, S., Takeyama, M., & Inoue, N. (2025)..https://www.springerprofessio...between-artificial-/50358834

Organisation:

Site Observations:

Observation Date

1st May 2017 – 1st Oct 2020

Action Summary:

An artificial reef was constructed nearby a natural kelp forest to promote restoration of Sargassum in the area. Monitoring occured for 3 years following construction.

Lessons Learned:

Long-term monitoring is necessary to determine whether restored Sargassum communities on artificial reefs eventually stabilise and resemble nearby natural reefs. Community composition remained dynamic through time, with succession progressing from early colonising species toward dominance by Sargassum patens, which may represent a climax-forming species in the region.

Project Outcomes:

The average percent cover of all seaweeds in the first, second, and third monitoring studies was 7, 45, and 77% at the artificial sites, and 55, 67, and 83% at the natural sites, respectively. Regarding species diversity, large brown seaweeds consisting of eight species of Sargassum and one species of Myagropsis were recorded. At 6 artificial reef sites, an average of 2 Sargassum species were found in the first monitoring study (May 2018), 6 species in the second monitoring study (July 2020), and 6 species in the third monitoring study (October 2020). However, the Sargassum species mostly dominated by 3 species of S. patens that have highly the percent cover, followed by S. hemiphyllum/S. piluliferum. Meanwhile, at 3 natural reef sites, there were 2, 2, and 3 species of Sargassum, respectively, with dominated by S. patens followed by S. macrocarpum. Since both the artificial and natural reefs were dominated by only one species of S. patens, it could be assumed that S. patens may be the climax-forming species in this region.

Area of Restoration (Ha)

2

Distance to nearest kelp forest (in metres)

10

Indicator Data:

Indicator:

Ending Value:

Starting Value:

Kelp Cover

77.0000
%
0.0000
%